Independent · Algorithm-scored · No pay-to-rank
Payoneer Workforce Management EOR review
Global EOR and contractor management on Payoneer's payment rails
The decision layer
Should you pick Payoneer Workforce Management?
// payoneer workforce management at a glance
Payoneer Workforce Management is an Employer of Record provider offering EOR, payroll and contractor payments. It scores 78/100 on the EOR Select index, covers 160 countries, and starts from $199 per employee per month.
- What it is
- Employer of Record (EOR, payroll and contractor payments)
- Select Score
- 78/100
- Country coverage
- 160 countries
- Entry EOR price
- from $199/mo
- Third-party rating
- 4.6/5 from 409 reviews
As of July 14, 2026 · scored by the EOR Select rating system (methodology)
// the verdict
The verdict
Payoneer Workforce Management scores 78/100 on the Select Score, strongest on platform and support. EOR pricing starts from $199 per employee per month. Its weakest axis is compliance, the clearest trade-off to weigh before committing.
Payoneer Workforce Management, founded in 2019 and headquartered in New York, offers EOR, payroll, and contractor management across broad global coverage. Pricing sits toward the lower end of the market, making it a fit for cost-conscious teams that need wide geographic reach without a premium price tag. It suits companies managing a mix of employees and contractors across multiple regions.
// strengths & watch-outs
Strengths and watch-outs
// strengths
- Low entry EOR pricing, from $199/mo
- Among the broadest coverage in the dataset (160 countries)
- Wide integration support (12 integrations)
- Strong third-party reviews (4.58/5 across 409)
// watch-outs
No notable watch-outs from the data on file.
// how it scores
How Payoneer Workforce Management scores
Covers 160 countries, 86% of the 185-country benchmark.
EOR pricing from $199 per employee per month. Lower is scored higher.
2 security certifications on file, with a blended third-party review score of 4.58 out of 5 across 409 reviews (weighted by review volume).
12 listed integrations.
5 support channels on file, with a blended third-party review score of 4.58 out of 5 across 409 reviews (weighted by review volume).
Based on 18 approved Reddit mentions (6 positive, 10 neutral, 2 negative; 15 first-hand). First-hand accounts weigh more than second-hand remarks; 2 mentions from possible promotional accounts are down-weighted. Net community sentiment leans positive; Reputation scored 68.
The total is weighted by how much independent review evidence backs this provider, so it can sit below the average of the categories above. How scoring works
// watch our review
Watch our Payoneer Workforce Management review
The data record
Payoneer Workforce Management by the numbers
// pricing
What Payoneer Workforce Management costs
EOR
per employee / month
Contractor
per employee / month
Payroll
Normalized starting prices from our dataset. Final pricing depends on country and headcount. Full Payoneer Workforce Management pricing breakdown →
verified September 1, 2026provider pricing pages
// country coverage
Where Payoneer Workforce Management operates
Verified Employer of Record coverage in 160 countries, from the same normalized dataset used to score every provider.
Show all 160 countries
- Anguilla
- Argentina
- Bahamas
- Barbados
- Belize
- Bolivia
- Brazil
- Canada
- Chile
- Colombia
- Costa Rica
- Dominica
- Dominican Republic
- Ecuador
- El Salvador
- Greenland
- Guatemala
- Guyana
- Haiti
- Honduras
- Jamaica
- Mexico
- Nicaragua
- Panama
- Paraguay
- Peru
- Puerto Rico
- Saint Lucia
- Trinidad and Tobago
- United States
- Uruguay
- Venezuela
- Albania
- Andorra
- Austria
- Belarus
- Belgium
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Bulgaria
- Croatia
- Cyprus
- Czechia
- Denmark
- Estonia
- Finland
- France
- Germany
- Gibraltar
- Greece
- Hungary
- Iceland
- Ireland
- Italy
- Kosovo
- Latvia
- Lithuania
- Luxembourg
- Malta
- Moldova
- Monaco
- Montenegro
- Netherlands
- North Macedonia
- Norway
- Poland
- Portugal
- Romania
- San Marino
- Serbia
- Slovakia
- Slovenia
- Spain
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Ukraine
- United Kingdom
- Algeria
- Angola
- Botswana
- Burundi
- Cameroon
- Chad
- Comoros
- Djibouti
- DR Congo
- Egypt
- Ethiopia
- Ghana
- Ivory Coast
- Kenya
- Liberia
- Libya
- Madagascar
- Malawi
- Mauritius
- Morocco
- Mozambique
- Namibia
- Nigeria
- Republic of the Congo
- Rwanda
- Senegal
- Sierra Leone
- Somalia
- South Africa
- Sudan
- Tanzania
- Togo
- Tunisia
- Uganda
- Zambia
- Zimbabwe
- Afghanistan
- Armenia
- Azerbaijan
- Bahrain
- Bangladesh
- Bhutan
- Cambodia
- China
- Georgia
- Hong Kong
- India
- Indonesia
- Iraq
- Israel
- Japan
- Jordan
- Kazakhstan
- Kuwait
- Kyrgyzstan
- Laos
- Lebanon
- Malaysia
- Maldives
- Mongolia
- Myanmar
- Nepal
- Oman
- Pakistan
- Palestine
- Philippines
- Qatar
- Saudi Arabia
- Singapore
- South Korea
- Sri Lanka
- Taiwan
- Tajikistan
- Thailand
- Turkey
- Turkmenistan
- United Arab Emirates
- Uzbekistan
- Vietnam
- Australia
- Fiji
- New Zealand
- Papua New Guinea
- Samoa
verified July 14, 2026normalized EOR coverage dataset
// employment entities
Who legally employs your people
The legal entities behind Payoneer Workforce Management’s employment coverage, from its own public documents and official corporate registries. Registry verified means we matched the entity in a corporate registry and linked the record. This table only shows what is publicly evidenced; it is not a complete list of Payoneer Workforce Management’s entities.
| Country | Legal entity | Evidence | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Argentina | Own entity stated, name not published | Stated by provider | — |
| Australia | Own entity stated, name not published | Stated by provider | — |
| Belgium | Own entity stated, name not published | Stated by provider | — |
| Brazil | Own entity stated, name not published | Stated by provider | — |
| Bulgaria | Own entity stated, name not published | Stated by provider | — |
| Cameroon | Own entity stated, name not published | Stated by provider | — |
| Canada | Own entity stated, name not published | Stated by provider | — |
| Chile | Own entity stated, name not published | Stated by provider | — |
Show all 160 countries ↓
| Colombia | Own entity stated, name not published | Stated by provider | — |
| Costa Rica | Own entity stated, name not published | Stated by provider | — |
| Croatia | Own entity stated, name not published | Stated by provider | — |
| Cyprus | Own entity stated, name not published | Stated by provider | — |
| Czechia | Own entity stated, name not published | Stated by provider | — |
| Denmark | Own entity stated, name not published | Stated by provider | — |
| Egypt | Own entity stated, name not published | Stated by provider | — |
| Estonia | Own entity stated, name not published | Stated by provider | — |
| Finland | Own entity stated, name not published | Stated by provider | — |
| France | Own entity stated, name not published | Stated by provider | — |
| Germany | Own entity stated, name not published | Stated by provider | — |
| Greece | Own entity stated, name not published | Stated by provider | — |
| Hong Kong | Own entity stated, name not published | Stated by provider | — |
| Hungary | Own entity stated, name not published | Stated by provider | — |
| India | Own entity stated, name not published | Stated by provider | — |
| Indonesia | Own entity stated, name not published | Stated by provider | — |
| Ireland | Own entity stated, name not published | Stated by provider | — |
| Kenya | Own entity stated, name not published | Stated by provider | — |
| Lithuania | Own entity stated, name not published | Stated by provider | — |
| Malaysia | Own entity stated, name not published | Stated by provider | — |
| Malta | Own entity stated, name not published | Stated by provider | — |
| Mexico | Own entity stated, name not published | Stated by provider | — |
| Netherlands | Skuad Netherlands B.V. | Stated by provider | Provider document→ |
| New Zealand | Own entity stated, name not published | Stated by provider | — |
| Nigeria | Own entity stated, name not published | Stated by provider | — |
| Norway | Own entity stated, name not published | Stated by provider | — |
| Pakistan | Own entity stated, name not published | Stated by provider | — |
| Peru | Own entity stated, name not published | Stated by provider | — |
| Philippines | Own entity stated, name not published | Stated by provider | — |
| Poland | Own entity stated, name not published | Stated by provider | — |
| Portugal | Own entity stated, name not published | Stated by provider | — |
| Romania | Own entity stated, name not published | Stated by provider | — |
| Serbia | Own entity stated, name not published | Stated by provider | — |
| Singapore | Own entity stated, name not published | Stated by provider | — |
| South Africa | Own entity stated, name not published | Stated by provider | — |
| Spain | Own entity stated, name not published | Stated by provider | — |
| Sweden | Own entity stated, name not published | Stated by provider | — |
| Thailand | Own entity stated, name not published | Stated by provider | — |
| Turkey | Own entity stated, name not published | Stated by provider | — |
| Ukraine | Own entity stated, name not published | Stated by provider | — |
| United Kingdom | Own entity stated, name not published | Stated by provider | — |
| United States | Own entity stated, name not published | Stated by provider | — |
| Vietnam | Own entity stated, name not published | Stated by provider | — |
| Afghanistan | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Albania | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Algeria | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Andorra | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Angola | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Anguilla | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Armenia | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Austria | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Azerbaijan | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Bahamas | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Bahrain | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Bangladesh | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Barbados | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Belarus | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Belize | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Bhutan | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Bolivia | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Botswana | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Burundi | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Cambodia | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Chad | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| China | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Comoros | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Djibouti | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Dominica | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Dominican Republic | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| DR Congo | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Ecuador | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| El Salvador | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Ethiopia | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Fiji | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Georgia | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Ghana | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Gibraltar | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Greenland | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Guatemala | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Guyana | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Haiti | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Honduras | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Iceland | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Iraq | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Israel | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Italy | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Ivory Coast | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Jamaica | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Japan | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Jordan | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Kazakhstan | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Kosovo | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Kuwait | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Kyrgyzstan | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Laos | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Latvia | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Lebanon | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Liberia | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Libya | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Luxembourg | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Madagascar | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Malawi | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Maldives | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Mauritius | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Moldova | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Monaco | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Mongolia | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Montenegro | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Morocco | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Mozambique | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Myanmar | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Namibia | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Nepal | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Nicaragua | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| North Macedonia | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Oman | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Palestine | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Panama | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Papua New Guinea | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Paraguay | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Puerto Rico | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Qatar | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Republic of the Congo | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Rwanda | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Saint Lucia | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Samoa | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| San Marino | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Saudi Arabia | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Senegal | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Sierra Leone | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Slovakia | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Slovenia | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Somalia | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| South Korea | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Sri Lanka | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Sudan | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Switzerland | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Taiwan | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Tajikistan | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Tanzania | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Togo | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Trinidad and Tobago | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Tunisia | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Turkmenistan | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Uganda | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| United Arab Emirates | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Uruguay | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Uzbekistan | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Venezuela | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Zambia | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
| Zimbabwe | Own entity stated, name not published | Partner disclosed | — |
verified July 14, 2026corporate registries & provider documents
// platform & operations
How Payoneer Workforce Management runs
Payoneer Workforce Management integrates with 12 tools and holds 2 security certifications.
- Security & compliance
- soc2gdpr
- Integrations
- Accounting/ERP:** QuickBooksXeroNetSuiteHRIS:** BambooHRWorkdayADPGustoCommunication:** SlackMicrosoft TeamsTime-tracking/Expense:** HarvestExpensifyQuickBooks
- Payroll & platform
- Multi-currencyAutomated taxTax filingPayslip generationEmployee portalAPI accessHRIS integrationCompliance dashboardDedicated supportMobile appOn-demand pay
- Pay-run frequency
- Bi-weeklySemi-monthly
- Payment methods
- Bank transferACHSEPASWIFTLocal bankWisePayPalCrypto
- Support channels
- Live chatPhoneEmailDedicated CSMKnowledge base
- Employee payouts
- Local currency, across 160 countries: 124 currencies including EUR, USD, GBP, INR
- Founded
- 2019
- Headquarters
- New York, US
- Employees
- 1001-5000
- CEO
- John Caplan
verified July 14, 2026provider disclosures
// fee transparency
What Payoneer Workforce Management tells you before you ask
This scores only what Payoneer Workforce Management publishes, not whether its prices are low. A cost counts as disclosed when we can link the provider’s own page stating it. See the full ranking or how this is scored.
verified September 1, 2026provider disclosures, own-domain sourced
Outside evidence
What the market says about Payoneer Workforce Management
// reviews across the web
What Payoneer Workforce Management customers say
352 reviews
View on G2 →42 reviews
View on Capterra →15 reviews
View on Trustpilot →| Platform | Rating | Change | Reviews | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| G2 | 4.6 | steady | 352 | +204 |
| Capterra | 4.6 | +1.20 | 42 | +37 |
| Trustpilot | 4.0 | steady | 15 | steady |
// reddit reputation
Payoneer Workforce Management on Reddit
Across 18 approved Reddit mentions of Payoneer Workforce Management (as of Mar 2026), 33% were positive, 56% neutral and 11% negative. The most-discussed topics were platform, compliance, onboarding. We screen each mention for relevance, then label sentiment. Unfiltered operator experience, separate from our Select Score.
18 mentions · 15 first-hand · 2 from promotional accounts, down-weighted
// key takeaways
What people praise
- Compliance (2)
- Onboarding (2)
Common complaints
- Platform (2)
Raw counts. The Reputation score also weighs recency, first-hand directness and author trust.
// most discussed topics
| Topic | Mentions | Sentiment |
|---|---|---|
| Platform | 4 | Mostly negative |
| Compliance | 3 | Mostly positive |
| Onboarding | 3 | Mostly positive |
| Support | 3 | Mixed |
| Pricing | 2 | Mixed |
Reputation subscore
This sentiment feeds the Reputation dimension of the Select Score.
We re-check Reddit monthly; newest mention as of Mar 2026. How we screen and score mentions →
// individual mentions
Experiences with Employer of Record (EOR) services for hiring in South Africa?
“Hi everyone, I’m based in Europe and looking to hire a person based in Johannesburg. Rather than setting up a South African company, I’m considering using an Employer of Record (EOR) service to handle contracts, payroll, and compliance.”
AI summary: Post lists Skuad among EOR options for South Africa hiring but provides no direct experience or evaluation of Skuad specifically.
Skuad: How does it work?
“Nag-search ako and saw that some companies use Skuad to pay their remote employees and contractors or coordinate employee-related docs with them.”
Translation: “I searched around and saw that some companies use Skuad to pay their remote employees and contractors, or to coordinate employee-related documents with them.”
AI summary: Filipino job-seeker just learned about EORs after receiving a job offer through Skuad and asks the community how the arrangement works and whether they'll be a regular employee.
Anyone who switched from Remofirst to Deel? Why?
“For one of my friends, Skuad provided a better deal so he switched to it rather than following up on his contract with Deel.”
AI summary: Commenter notes a friend switched to Skuad from Deel because Skuad offered a better price deal.
Skuad: How does it work? ......
“sa side ni Skuad ang problem.”
Translation: “The problem is on Skuad's side.”
AI summary: User briefly indicates a problem on Skuad's side has been resolved, implying there was a service issue but it was fixed.
EOR em Portugal
“Boas! Tenho uma proposta de trabalho para uma empresa estrangeira, que propuseram trabalhar com uma EOR, neste caso a Skuad. Algum feedback sobre esta EOR? Pagam a tempo? São de confiança? Qualquer comentário é bem-vindo!”
Translation: “Hi! I have a job offer from a foreign company, who proposed working with an EOR, in this case Skuad. Any feedback on this EOR? Do they pay on time? Are they trustworthy? Any comment is welcome!”
AI summary: User received a job offer via Skuad as EOR in Portugal and is asking for feedback on reliability and timely payment.
Has anyone worked through an Employer of Record (EOR)?
“I know. I asked Deel and Remote and they both told me that cannot sponsor work permit. The EOR I am discussing this with is [Skuad.io](https://Skuad.io). Can you describe your current situation? I am pretty curious because such cases are very rare.”
AI summary: User is actively discussing Skuad.io as the EOR they are negotiating with for a work permit in Turkey, contrasting it with Deel and Remote who declined.
Skuad: How does it work? ......
“So far after 1 year, good og stable ra si Skuad sa imoha? in terms of smooth payroll and transactions?”
Translation: “So far after 1 year, is Skuad good and stable for you? In terms of smooth payroll and transactions?”
AI summary: User asks someone about their experience with Skuad after one year, specifically regarding payroll smoothness and stability.
Skuad: How does it work? ......
“Under kayo Skuad or not? Very hesitant since wala ako masyadong makita na reviews about Skuad na under Philippines. Pwede pahingi input pls?”
Translation: “Are you under Skuad or not? Very hesitant since I can barely find any reviews about Skuad under the Philippines. Can I get some input please?”
AI summary: User is hesitant about being employed under Skuad and asks for input from others in the Philippines who have experience with the platform.
Skuad: How does it work? ......
“bakit nag iinvalid token ako pag nag eenter ng payment details sa Skuad? Huhu wala man lang details tapos di pa nagrereply customer service”
Translation: “Why do I keep getting an invalid token when entering payment details on Skuad? Huhu there are no details at all and customer service isn't replying either.”
AI summary: User reports getting invalid token errors when entering payment details on Skuad and complains that customer service is unresponsive.
Best Employer of Record or (EOR) services for hiring international employees?
“I experienced using Skuas and multiplier and I am fully satisfied with Skuad. Here’s the reason why: - customer service were excellent. They responded faster than multiplier. - they send salary early/on time and multiplier is always late by 3-7 days.”
AI summary: User reports firsthand satisfaction with Skuad, citing fast customer service, on-time salary payments, and no issues experienced.
Experience using a global payroll vendor?
“We started off with Deel but its cost was on the higher side. We have had great experience with both these platforms.”
AI summary: Author's organization used Skuad (Payoneer Workforce Management) and reports a great experience with the platform.
Skuad: How does it work? ......
“Yep. In a way protected pa rin tayo under the labor code ng PH. Since yung Skuad ang magiging considered as employer and they have a PH entity.”
Translation: “Yes. In a way we are still protected under the labor code of the Philippines. Since Skuad will be considered as the employer and they have a Philippine entity.”
AI summary: Commenter confirms Skuad acts as the legal employer in the Philippines with a local entity, meaning workers retain protection under Philippine labor law.
Skuad: How does it work? ......
“Did not experience naman any errors sa Skuad so I'm not sure.”
AI summary: User says they have not experienced any errors with Skuad, implying a smooth experience so far.
Skuad: How does it work? ......
“They're just my employer of record, so I have no idea. My true employer is overseas and they're using Skuad to employ me.”
AI summary: User confirms they are employed through Skuad as an EOR on behalf of an overseas employer, but has limited direct knowledge of how Skuad works internally.
Skuad: How does it work? ......
“Kaka-onboard ko rin through Skuad and yes, parang regular employee ka rin sa PH. May tax, Philhealth, SSS, Pag-ibig deductions.”
Translation: “I just got onboarded through Skuad too, and yes, it's like being a regular employee in the Philippines. There are tax, PhilHealth, SSS, and Pag-IBIG deductions.”
AI summary: Recently onboarded employee via Skuad confirms the experience mirrors being a regular Philippine employee, with standard statutory deductions (tax, PhilHealth, SSS, Pag-ibig).
Skuad: How does it work? ......
“Which bank best to enroll as Payment Details in Skuad? Is it okay/safe to use local banks in the Philippines?”
AI summary: First-time Skuad user in the Philippines asks which bank or payment method (local bank, Wise, Seabank, Gotyme) is best to use for receiving payments through Skuad.
Skuad: How does it work? ......
“Super smooth na setup sa pangkalahatan!”
Translation: “Super smooth setup overall!”
AI summary: Comment reads as promotional/marketing copy describing Skuad/Payoneer Workforce Management's features and praising the setup — likely an affiliate or employee pitch.
Skuad/Payoneer alternatives that won’t flag AMLA.
“Hey everyone, I’m part of the management team for a US-based virtual agency. We have a growing team here in the Philippines, but our current payroll situation is a nightmare. We’re currently using Payoneer WFM (formerly Skuad), and it has been incredibly…”
AI summary: Management team reports serious problems with Payoneer WFM (formerly Skuad): system bugs, delayed paydays, and high fees, and is actively seeking alternatives.
A note on Reddit: not every comment is a genuine, independent user. Some posts come from marketing agencies, competitors or the providers themselves. We screen mentions for relevance before they count toward a score, but we show this discussion as community signal, not verified fact, so weigh it with that in mind.
History & background
Payoneer Workforce Management track record & company
// the record over time
How Payoneer Workforce Management has moved
Longitudinal readings we keep and most comparison sites don’t. Every point is a real dated snapshot.
Up 2 points since Jun 27, 2026.
| Date | Select Score |
|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2026 | 76/100 |
| Jul 1, 2026 | 76/100 |
| Jul 16, 2026 | 74/100 |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 73/100 |
| Jul 27, 2026 | 78/100 |
updated Sep 1, 2026weekly Select Score recompute
Unchanged at $199/mo since Jul 2026.
| Month | Published EOR price |
|---|---|
| Jul 2026 | $199/mo |
| Aug 2026 | $199/mo |
| Sep 2026 | $199/mo |
updated Sep 1, 2026monthly provider-pricing snapshots
// recent updates
What changed for Payoneer Workforce Management
Tracked changes to Payoneer Workforce Management's Select Score and review ratings
- Select ScoreJul 27, 2026
Now 78/100, from 73.
- G2Aug 31, 2026
Rating now 4.6. +204 new reviews (352 total).
Review scores are re-verified weekly. How we verify the data →
// funding history
Payoneer Workforce Management funding
$19M raised across 2 disclosed rounds
- Series A$15MOct 1, 2022Led by Southeast Asian venture capital fund
Southeast Asian venture capital fund, U.S. strategic investor specializing in staffing, two leading global payments platforms, BEENEXT, Anthemis
Source → - Seed$4MDec 1, 2020Led by BEENEXT
BEENEXT, Anthemis Group, Alto Partners Multi-Family Office, Rohan Monga
Source →
// head to head
