eor/select
Run a comparison

// head to head

WTS Energy vs Remote

Our pick: Remote with a Select Score of 76/100
comparison.matrix2 selected
WTS Energy vs Remote comparison matrix
ProviderWTS Energy logoWTS Energy59/100 Select PickRemote logoRemote76/100
Coverage & pricing
Countries covered68186
EOR / employee / mo$699
Contractor / employee / mo$29
Payroll / employee / mo$29
Fee transparency
Fee transparency0/10025/100
Company
HeadquartersGBUS
Founded20002019
Employees501-10001001-5000
Capabilities
Direct EOR
Built-in payroll
Contractor management
Reviews across the web
G2 rating4.5 · 4.4k
Capterra rating4.4 · 97
Trustpilot rating1.0 · 3.3k
Blended rating3.0 · 7.8k
Glassdoor (employer)3.4 · 592
Trust & support
Security certifications55
Support channels64
Scores
Compliance6579
Support9287
Select Score5976

// reddit reputation, side by side

WTS Energy vs Remote on Reddit

On Reddit, Remote sits at 29% negative across 42 approved mentions. We screen real community mentions for relevance, then label sentiment, separate from our Select Score.

ProviderMentionsFirst-handPositiveNeutralNegativeSentiment
WTS EnergyToo few Reddit mentions to score yet
Remote422326%45%29%Mostly negative

Most-discussed topics: Remote — support

WTS Energy

Best-scored support of the set.

Read the full WTS Energy review →
Remote Select Pick

Widest coverage in this comparison (186 countries).

Read the full Remote review →

// faq

WTS Energy vs Remote: your questions

Which is better, WTS Energy or Remote?

On our normalized dataset, Remote has the highest Select Score (76/100). The right pick still depends on your priorities, which the matrix above breaks down row by row.

Which is cheapest?

Remote has the lowest starting price in this comparison. Pricing is normalized to a per-employee monthly figure.

How is the Select Score calculated?

Every provider runs the same weighted model across coverage, pricing, compliance, platform and support. See the methodology page for the full formula.