// head to head
Remote People vs Native Teams
Where Remote People and Native Teams can employ
On our coverage data, Remote People runs an EOR in 149 countries and Native Teams in 77. They overlap in 76, so for 51% of the 150 countries either one covers, you can pick on price and service rather than reach. The difference sits in 73 countries only Remote People covers and 1 country only Native Teams covers. If your next hire is in one of them, that decides it.
Only Remote People 73 countries
- Americas
- Antigua and Barbuda, Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Bolivia, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Greenland, Grenada, Guatemala, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, Martinique, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Puerto Rico, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Suriname, Trinidad and Tobago, Uruguay, Venezuela
- Europe
- Belgium, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Monaco, San Marino
- Africa
- Benin, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Eswatini, Ethiopia, Gabon, Ghana, Lesotho, Malawi, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mozambique, Namibia, Réunion, Rwanda, Senegal, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Uganda, Zambia
- Asia
- Bahrain, Bhutan, Cambodia, China, Israel, Jordan, Kuwait, Laos, Lebanon, Macau, Mongolia, Myanmar, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Taiwan, Tajikistan, Timor-Leste, United Arab Emirates
- Oceania
- Fiji, Nauru
Only Native Teams 1 country
- Africa
- Tanzania
Own entity or local partner
An EOR either employs your hire through its own local company or through a partner it contracts. With its own entity, the provider controls payroll and compliance directly; with a partner, a third company is the legal employer.
Remote People does not publicly name its employing entities, so we cannot show where it employs directly.
Native Teams publicly documents its own employing entity in 2 countries (United Kingdom and Latvia).
Only entities with a public source (a registry record or the provider’s own legal documents) are counted. A provider can have more entities than it publishes.
What the fee difference adds up to
Native Teams's published EOR fee is $100 lower per employee per month. That is $1,200 a year for one hire and $12,000 a year for a team of ten, before any volume discount either provider negotiates.
| Employees | Remote People | Native Teams |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | $2,388 | $1,188 |
| 5 | $11,940 | $5,940 |
| 10 | $23,880 | $11,880 |
| 25 | $59,700 | $29,700 |
| 50 | $119,400 | $59,400 |
Starting fees only, excluding salary and employer contributions. The matrix above lists the setup, offboarding, deposit and FX fees each provider discloses. Model a full hire in the cost calculator.
// reddit reputation, side by side
Remote People vs Native Teams on Reddit
On Reddit, Native Teams sits at 26% negative across 27 approved mentions. We screen real community mentions for relevance, then label sentiment, separate from our Select Score.
| Provider | Mentions | First-hand | Positive | Neutral | Negative | Sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Remote People | Too few Reddit mentions to score yet | |||||
| Native Teams | 27 | 15 | 33% | 41% | 26% | Mostly positive |
Most-discussed topics: Native Teams — pricing
Widest coverage in this comparison (150 countries).
Read the full Remote People review →// faq
Remote People vs Native Teams: your questions
Which is better, Remote People or Native Teams?
On our normalized dataset, Remote People has the highest Select Score (74/100). The right pick still depends on your priorities, which the matrix above breaks down row by row.
Which is cheapest?
Native Teams has the lowest starting price in this comparison. Pricing is normalized to a per-employee monthly figure.
How is the Select Score calculated?
Every provider runs the same weighted model across coverage, pricing, compliance, platform and support. See the methodology page for the full formula.