// head to head
Lano vs Payoneer Workforce Management
Where Lano and Payoneer Workforce Management can employ
On our coverage data, Lano runs an EOR in 186 countries and Payoneer Workforce Management in 160. They overlap in 150, so for 77% of the 196 countries either one covers, you can pick on price and service rather than reach. The difference sits in 36 countries only Lano covers and 10 countries only Payoneer Workforce Management covers. If your next hire is in one of them, that decides it.
Only Lano 36 countries
- Americas
- Antigua and Barbuda, Grenada, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Suriname
- Europe
- Liechtenstein, Vatican City
- Africa
- Benin, Burkina Faso, Cape Verde, Central African Republic, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Eswatini, Gabon, Gambia, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Lesotho, Mali, Mauritania, Niger, São Tomé and Príncipe, Seychelles
- Asia
- Brunei, Timor-Leste, Yemen
- Oceania
- Kiribati, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, Nauru, Palau, Solomon Islands, Tonga, Tuvalu, Vanuatu
Only Payoneer Workforce Management 10 countries
- Americas
- Anguilla, Greenland, Venezuela
- Europe
- Belarus, Gibraltar
- Africa
- Libya, Sudan
- Asia
- Maldives, Myanmar, Palestine
Own entity or local partner
An EOR either employs your hire through its own local company or through a partner it contracts. With its own entity, the provider controls payroll and compliance directly; with a partner, a third company is the legal employer.
Lano publicly documents its own employing entity in 1 country (Germany).
Payoneer Workforce Management publicly documents its own employing entity in 1 country (Netherlands).
Only entities with a public source (a registry record or the provider’s own legal documents) are counted. A provider can have more entities than it publishes.
What the fee difference adds up to
Payoneer Workforce Management's published EOR fee is $362 lower per employee per month. That is $4,348 a year for one hire and $43,485 a year for a team of ten, before any volume discount either provider negotiates.
| Employees | Lano | Payoneer Workforce Management |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | $6,736 | $2,388 |
| 5 | $33,682 | $11,940 |
| 10 | $67,365 | $23,880 |
| 25 | $168,412 | $59,700 |
| 50 | $336,825 | $119,400 |
Starting fees only, excluding salary and employer contributions. The matrix above lists the setup, offboarding, deposit and FX fees each provider discloses. Model a full hire in the cost calculator.
// reddit reputation, side by side
Lano vs Payoneer Workforce Management on Reddit
On Reddit, Payoneer Workforce Management sits at 11% negative across 18 approved mentions. We screen real community mentions for relevance, then label sentiment, separate from our Select Score.
| Provider | Mentions | First-hand | Positive | Neutral | Negative | Sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lano | Too few Reddit mentions to score yet | |||||
| Payoneer Workforce Management | 18 | 15 | 33% | 56% | 11% | Mostly positive |
Most-discussed topics: Payoneer Workforce Management — platform
Lowest entry EOR price here, from $199/mo.
Read the full Payoneer Workforce Management review →// faq
Lano vs Payoneer Workforce Management: your questions
Which is better, Lano or Payoneer Workforce Management?
On our normalized dataset, Payoneer Workforce Management has the highest Select Score (79/100). The right pick still depends on your priorities, which the matrix above breaks down row by row.
Which is cheapest?
Payoneer Workforce Management has the lowest starting price in this comparison. Pricing is normalized to a per-employee monthly figure.
How is the Select Score calculated?
Every provider runs the same weighted model across coverage, pricing, compliance, platform and support. See the methodology page for the full formula.