eor/select
Run a comparison

// head to head

Hire with Columbus vs Remote People

Our pick: Remote People with a Select Score of 75/100
comparison.matrix2 selected
Hire with Columbus vs Remote People comparison matrix
ProviderHire with Columbus logoHire with Columbus70/100 Select PickRemote People logoRemote People75/100
Coverage & pricing
Countries covered186150
EOR / employee / mo$179$199
Contractor / employee / mo$25$29
Payroll / employee / mo$179—
Fee transparency
Fee transparency25/10025/100
Company
HeadquartersSGSG
Founded20252018
Capabilities
Direct EOR
Built-in payroll
Contractor management
Reviews across the web
G2 rating5.0 · 164.7 · 422
Capterra rating—4.9 · 72
Trustpilot rating—4.2 · 85
Blended rating5.0 · 164.7 · 579
Glassdoor (employer)—4.7 · 80
Trust & support
Security certifications55
Support channels65
Scores
Compliance6779
Support9394
Select Score7075
Hire with Columbus

Widest coverage in this comparison (186 countries).

Read the full Hire with Columbus review →
Remote People Select Pick

Strongest compliance depth of the set.

Read the full Remote People review →

// faq

Hire with Columbus vs Remote People: your questions

Which is better, Hire with Columbus or Remote People?

On our normalized dataset, Remote People has the highest Select Score (75/100). The right pick still depends on your priorities, which the matrix above breaks down row by row.

Which is cheapest?

Hire with Columbus has the lowest starting price in this comparison. Pricing is normalized to a per-employee monthly figure.

How is the Select Score calculated?

Every provider runs the same weighted model across coverage, pricing, compliance, platform and support. See the methodology page for the full formula.