// head to head
Gloroots vs Wisemonk
Own entity or local partner
An EOR either employs your hire through its own local company or through a partner it contracts. With its own entity, the provider controls payroll and compliance directly; with a partner, a third company is the legal employer.
Gloroots does not publicly name its employing entities, so we cannot show where it employs directly.
Wisemonk publicly documents its own employing entity in 1 country (India).
Only entities with a public source (a registry record or the provider’s own legal documents) are counted. A provider can have more entities than it publishes.
What the fee difference adds up to
Wisemonk's published EOR fee is $100 lower per employee per month. That is $1,200 a year for one hire and $12,000 a year for a team of ten, before any volume discount either provider negotiates.
| Employees | Gloroots | Wisemonk |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | $2,388 | $1,188 |
| 5 | $11,940 | $5,940 |
| 10 | $23,880 | $11,880 |
| 25 | $59,700 | $29,700 |
| 50 | $119,400 | $59,400 |
Starting fees only, excluding salary and employer contributions. The matrix above lists the setup, offboarding, deposit and FX fees each provider discloses. Model a full hire in the cost calculator.
Widest coverage in this comparison (150 countries).
Read the full Gloroots review →// faq
Gloroots vs Wisemonk: your questions
Which is better, Gloroots or Wisemonk?
On our normalized dataset, Gloroots has the highest Select Score (67/100). The right pick still depends on your priorities, which the matrix above breaks down row by row.
Which is cheapest?
Wisemonk has the lowest starting price in this comparison. Pricing is normalized to a per-employee monthly figure.
How is the Select Score calculated?
Every provider runs the same weighted model across coverage, pricing, compliance, platform and support. See the methodology page for the full formula.