eor/select
Run a comparison

// head to head

Rippling vs Remote

Rippling and Remote both cover EOR, payroll, and contractor management, but they sit in different positions across the four axes that matter most to buyers. Remote brings a broader country map and a published entry EOR price, while Rippling is quote-only and scores higher in third-party user reviews. For buyers who want to compare numbers before speaking to sales, that pricing transparency gap is the first thing to weigh.

Remote edges ahead on our Select Score and suits buyers who prioritise wide geographic reach and a clear starting price before any sales conversation. Rippling is the stronger fit for teams that value platform depth and third-party review standing, and who are comfortable working through a custom quote. Neither is a weak choice: the right call depends on which of those trade-offs fits your situation.
comparison.matrix2 selected
Rippling vs Remote comparison matrix
ProviderRippling logoRippling66/100 Select PickRemote logoRemote76/100
Coverage & pricing
Countries covered83186
EOR / employee / moQuote$699/mo
Contractor / employee / moQuote$29/mo
Payroll / employee / moQuote$29/mo
Fees beyond the headline price
Off-cycle payroll run$50$29
Fee transparency0/10025/100
Company
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20162019
Employees10001+1001-5000
Capabilities
Direct EOR
Built-in payroll
Contractor management
Reviews across the web
G2 rating4.8 · 14k4.5 · 5.3k
Capterra rating4.9 · 4.9k4.3 · 101
Trustpilot rating4.5 · 2.5k4.6 · 3.5k
Blended rating4.8 · 21k4.5 · 8.9k
Glassdoor (employer)3.7 · 1.1k3.4 · 592
Trust & support
Security certifications33
Support channels64
Scores
Compliance7871
Support10088
Select Score6676

Which one fits you

Choose Rippling if

your team wants EOR, HR, payroll and IT management in one connected system rather than a standalone hiring tool. Rippling lists more support channels than Remote, including phone and a dedicated customer success manager, and its third-party review base is much larger and rates higher. It also has an employing entity in Ireland on public record, which may suit a team building a European footprint from there. The trade-off is that Rippling does not publish its EOR rate, so you will need a quote before you can compare cost, and its country list is narrower than Remote's.

Choose Remote if

your team is hiring across many countries, including less common ones, and wants one provider to cover them. Remote lists wider country coverage, publishes its EOR starting fee, and documents its own employing entities across a long list of markets. It also supports more payroll frequencies, from weekly to monthly, which helps when local norms differ. The trade-off is cost and support depth: its published EOR fee sits at the higher end of the market, and it lists fewer support channels than Rippling, with no phone line.

Where Rippling and Remote can employ

On our coverage data, Rippling runs an EOR in 83 countries and Remote in 186. They overlap in 83, so for 45% of the 186 countries either one covers, you can pick on price and service rather than reach. The difference sits in 103 countries only Remote covers. If your next hire is in one of them, that decides it.

Only Rippling 0 countries

None: every country Rippling covers is also on the other provider’s list.

Only Remote 103 countries

Americas
Antigua and Barbuda, Aruba, Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Bolivia, Dominica, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Grenada, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, Nicaragua, Paraguay, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Suriname, Venezuela
Europe
Andorra, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, Liechtenstein, Moldova, Monaco, Montenegro, North Macedonia, San Marino, Svalbard and Jan Mayen, Ukraine
Africa
Algeria, Angola, Benin, Botswana, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Central African Republic, Chad, Comoros, Djibouti, DR Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Eswatini, Ethiopia, Gabon, Gambia, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Ivory Coast, Lesotho, Liberia, Libya, Madagascar, Mali, Mauritania, Mozambique, Namibia, Niger, São Tomé and Príncipe, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Sudan, Togo, Zimbabwe
Asia
Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Bhutan, Brunei, Georgia, Hong Kong, Jordan, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Laos, Lebanon, Macau, Maldives, Mongolia, Nepal, Oman, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Tajikistan, Timor-Leste, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Yemen
Oceania
Fiji, Kiribati, Micronesia, Nauru, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tonga, Tuvalu

Own entity or local partner

An EOR either employs your hire through its own local company or through a partner it contracts. With its own entity, the provider controls payroll and compliance directly; with a partner, a third company is the legal employer.

Rippling publicly documents its own employing entity in 1 country (Ireland).

Remote publicly documents its own employing entity in 94 countries (Australia, Belgium, Czechia, Estonia, Finland, France, India, Latvia, Norway, Poland and 84 more).

Only entities with a public source (a registry record or the provider’s own legal documents) are counted. A provider can have more entities than it publishes.

What the fee difference adds up to

Rippling does not publish an EOR price, so only Remote's published fee can be totalled here. Ask Rippling for a written quote at your team size before comparing.

Published starting EOR fee per year, by team size (USD)
EmployeesRipplingRemote
1Quote only$8,388
5Quote only$41,940
10Quote only$83,880
25Quote only$209,700
50Quote only$419,400

Starting fees only, excluding salary and employer contributions. The matrix above lists the setup, offboarding, deposit and FX fees each provider discloses. Model a full hire in the cost calculator.

// reddit reputation, side by side

Rippling vs Remote on Reddit

On Reddit, Rippling draws the highest share of negative mentions (37% of 38); Remote the lowest (29% of 56). Approved mentions only. We screen real community mentions for relevance, then label sentiment, separate from our Select Score.

ProviderMentionsFirst-handPositiveNeutralNegativeSentiment
Rippling382129%34%37%Mostly negative
Remote563736%36%29%Mostly positive

Most-discussed topics: Rippling — platform · Remote — compliance

Rippling

Best-scored support of the set.

Read the full Rippling review →
Remote Select Pick

Widest coverage in this comparison (186 countries).

Read the full Remote review →

// faq

Rippling vs Remote: your questions

How does EOR pricing differ between Rippling and Remote?

Remote publishes its EOR starting fee, along with separate starting fees for payroll and contractor payments, so you can estimate cost before talking to sales. Rippling does not publish an EOR rate and quotes on request. If budget certainty matters early in your process, Remote is easier to model.

Which provider covers more countries?

Remote covers noticeably more countries than Rippling, and the coverage breakdown on this page shows which markets both support and which only one does. Check your target countries there before shortlisting. Rippling's list is still wide, but gaps are more likely in smaller markets.

How do Rippling and Remote employ people locally?

Both document their own employing entities on public sources, but the spread differs widely. Remote lists entities across a long run of countries, while Rippling's documented entity on record is in Ireland. The entity evidence shown on this page lets you confirm whether your hiring country has a provider-owned entity.

How do reviews and support compare, and is switching hard?

Rippling has a much larger review base with a higher blended rating, and it lists more support channels, including phone and a dedicated customer success manager. Remote's reviews are solid but fewer, and its support is chat, email and a knowledge base with round-the-clock cover. Switching EOR providers generally means transferring employment contracts to a new entity, so ask each provider how they handle transitions and overlapping payroll runs.